Skip to Content
👋 Hey there! Welcome to the Next.js Starter. Check it out

3.6 Asset concentration risk

3.6.1 Definition

  1. The Asset Concentration risk charge is an incremental risk charge above the Market and Credit risk charges, which acknowledges that assets held by IAIGs are not perfectly diversified.

3.6.2 ICS methodology

  1. The Asset concentration risk charge calculation involves a risk charge for:
  • a. real estate; and
  • b. assets other than real estate.
  1. The sum of a) and b) above is the risk charge for asset concentration.

3.6.3 Calibration

3.6.3.1 Real estate

  1. Due to insufficient data expert judgement was applied. The radius of 250 metres to identify group of properties to identify single exposure are based on the values identified for the terrorist attack submodule. The level of 3% is based on expert judgement and the stress level is consistent with the level of stress for real estate.

3.6.3.2 Assets other than real estate

3.6.3.2.1 Methodology
  1. The methodology is based on the paper Granularity Adjustment for Regulatory Capital Assessment by Gordy and Luetkebohmert.15)^{15)}
  1. The paper provides an approximation for the theoretical framework of a granularity adjustment, which is further reduced to a simplified granularity adjustment GA~\widetilde{GA}
  1. Further details can be found in the paper. Roughly speaking
  • • sis_i can be interpreted as the portfolio share,
  • • KiK_i as the unexpected loss,
  • • RiR_i as the expected loss.
  • • CiC_i is a term depending on the variance and expected value of loss given default (LGD) of asset ii and
  • • δ\delta is parameter that depends on the quantile of the distribution and a so-called precision parameter ξ\xi (which is proposed to be set to 0.25 in the paper).
3.6.3.2.2 Assumptions
  1. The following assumptions (going beyond the assumptions made in the paper) were made to determine the risk charge for the ICS.
  • a. Assume LGDi=LGD=0.45LGD_i = LGD = 0.45 to determine CiC_i. This choice is consistent with the assumptions for Credit risk.
  • b. RiR_i is relatively small compared to KiK_i
  • c. Ki+RiK_i + R_i is the ICS Equity and Credit risk charge.
  1. Using these assumptions (and as proposed in the paper that XX (the risk factor) is gamma distributed with mean μ=1\mu =1 and variance σ2=1ξ\sigma^2 = \frac{1}{\xi} ) yields.
  1. Where EiE_i is the net exposure to group of connected counterparties ii and KiK_i is the total risk charge for Credit and Equity risk before diversification and management actions.

  2. To limit the burden for IAIG to determine all connected counterparties a threshold value TT was introduced. This threshold value TT is to be chosen in a way such that the number of connected counterparties for which Ei>TE_i > T holds, is greater than 10 but does not exceed 100.

  1. The value dd is based on expert judgement.

Last updated on: